I recently read an article explaining why poor people stay poor, and was advised by this article that saving money costs money. I then continued to read about how this person lost their truck over a few hundred dollars. When I read further to find out that this person was running between two part time jobs, neither of which paid a hundred bucks a day, I found myself wondering, why in the world did this person think she could afford a truck in the first place?
A motor vehicle is a huge expense for anyone; the cost of the vehicle is just the tip of the iceberg. Add in the cost of gas, insurance, and maintenance, and it soon becomes apparent that owning a vehicle is an expensive luxury. Funny thing is, something like an old worn-out pickup truck might cost more month over month than would a new small car along the lines of a Mitsubishi Mirage. But then this line of logic would play into the whole notion of the cost of saving money, which misses the entire point. The real issue is, what was this person doing with a truck in the first place?
It's often the case that a person would feel insulted that I might suggest they should not own a vehicle; they see vehicle ownership as some sort of right. What has really happened is they've bought into the lifestyle marketing campaigns of the automobile industry that tell us we need to own a car or a truck. In fact, it's quite often the case that we're constantly chasing after different lifestyle dreams that are advertised to us, our lives become a disjointed mess, then suddenly, we believe we need to be chasing after two part time jobs in order to attain our dreams. In reality, the dreams aren't really ours, things are barely holding together and, unsurprisingly, a couple of unforeseen expenses undoes the whole "Rube Goldberg" machine.
What I suggest is that people take a moment to tune out the advertisers and take a holistic look at their life. I recommend starting with understanding the actual cost of owning a car. Some studies put just the cost of owning an average car at nearly $10,000 per year of after-tax dollars. If you believe you need to work at two part time jobs to own a car, the first thing to consider is whether one of those jobs will net you $10,000 after tax in a given year, the second is if owning the car is worth the hassles of that second part time job. To put this into perspective, if you're earning $11/hour, you'll need to put in 22 hours a week EVERY week of the year JUST TO OWN AND OPERATE a car. Even if you got the car for free with a full tank of gas, sooner or later these expenses will need to be paid if you actually expect to continue to drive. I ask you; is the second part time job really worth it just to have the headache of car ownership?
Perhaps it's better to abandon that second part time job, sell the car, and use the extra cash to invest in yourself. Growing numbers of people are living car-free, but it takes a big-picture view of your life. For example, you may need to relocate to a different city or find a different job. If you're in a relationship, it may mean making some short-term compromises. If there are children in the picture, there's all the more reason for you to start taking a holistic approach to life. There is no single easy solution, this is why it's critical for each of us to take a holistic approach to our own unique lifestyles.
I'm not suggesting anyone give up on the dream of owning a car forever; what I'm suggesting is that it will impede progress if one is struggling financially right now. Giving up on the car may allow one to focus on the better of the two part-time jobs, and perhaps that will allow you to develop a career out of it. Or maybe the time gained from leaving the less desirable part time job could be put towards self-improvement. It's all baby steps towards building a life that works. At the end of the day, recognize the car as a tool rather than an entitlement and necessary expense.
It really doesn't cost money to save money. What it takes is recognizing that saving money isn't be be-all and end-all in financial stability, and that taking a holistic approach to life is the solution. The money not spent on keeping that truck means a second part time job may not be necessary, which could mean time better spent at building a lifestyle that suits you and is one you can truly call your own.
Finally, if you find this blog post offensive, then you are looking to find offense in that which is not intended to be offensive, but perhaps feeling offended is the first step to your financial recovery and putting yourself in a position where you no longer consider yourself poor. It really is your life, nobody is in control but you. Make it the best life for you that you can.
"Growing numbers of people are living car-free, but it takes a big-picture view of your life. For example, you may need to relocate to a different city or find a different job."
ReplyDeleteFor the purposes of space conservation, I'd like to respond to these two sentences specifically, as they form the crux of much of this post.
1: Losing this truck forced the person who wrote the article, and her husband, to "live car-free" for some time, and the end result was both of them losing their jobs, and eventually their apartment.
2: No one... literally no one... makes less money than they need because they simply don't feel like making more money. You assume that a better paying job was simply available, and that the writer worked two part-time jobs that left them with no extra cash *by choice*. Obviously, this wasn't the case when, again, the writer "lived car-free" and was unable to find gainful employment in time to keep from being evicted.
3. If a person cannot afford to pay a $200 impound fee, the chances of them having the extra money it costs to move to an entirely different city are exactly zero. Moving expenses can quickly and easily rank in the range of thousands of dollars. Physically relocating means, at the very least, the cost of a bus ticket, around $75, and that's assuming that you are moving to a new city with literally nothing but what you can fit in a pair of suitcases. Moving into a new apartment means first, last, and security. Even in the cheapest cities in the US, that's easily $750+. Starting a new account with utility providers for electricity, water, and gas usually involves activation fees, in the range of $50-$100 each, and most providers require security deposits of $100-$300 for low-income customers. We've already reached a total of at least $1100, and are now the proud occupant of a one-bedroom apartment with no furniture and an empty refrigerator, in an unfamiliar city, with no reliable transportation, and no job. You seem to be asserting that being poor is a result of not being able to do basic math, but the math speaks against you.
Speaking of math, a note on the article as a whole: your math is off.
First, at $11/hour, you'd have to work 17.5 hours per week to net just over $10,000/year, not 22.
Second, that figure you cited of $10,000 per year to own a car includes a $3,571/year depreciation of value. A person who requires their car to get to and from work is almost never concerned with resale value. And even if they are, this is still not an actual "cost", it is simply a loss of value. The actual figure, then, is in the range of $6500/year, not $10,000.
That's just over 11 hours/week at $11/hour. A more reasonable figure. That is, as you point out, a lot of hours worked just to own a car, but sometimes not owning a car is not a viable option.
I can only say this about your article: it seems to speak from experience. I assume, from the way you assert your ideas as truth, that your methods have worked for you. Which leads you to believe that they will work for everyone.
The honest truth is that if these methods have worked for you, you have been fortunate. Fortunate enough... perhaps by living in the right city, or landing the right job, or even simply meeting the right person at the right time... that all it has taken for you to succeed in not being/considering yourself poor is to follow these methods.
But I speak from experience that this is simply not the case. Experience not much different than yours. It wasn't long ago that I would have agreed with practically every word of this article, because I lived my life in a similar way and was fortunate enough that it worked for me. Then I became less fortunate, and realized exactly how fortunate I had been in the past, which made me realize how much my good fortune had informed my opinions on financial stability. It was easy to not be poor because I had been lucky, not because I had solved some puzzle that poor people simply couldn't fathom.
Eric, you've clearly missed the entire point of my post; it wasn't about math or how accurate it is (which is fine for the sakes of this argument), but rather about taking a holistic approach to one's finances. The fact is, there are people who make $25 per hour who wouldn't be able to afford the $200 it would cost to get their vehicle out of impound. It has nothing to do with what people earn, and has everything to do with how they approach life, finances, and how everything interconnects and affects everything else.
ReplyDeleteThe very nature of a holistic approach means that I cannot tell this woman how to fix her problems in her life based on the biased, exaggerated commentary she's posted. She would have omitted important details she might have thought were embarrassing in order to better shift the burden of responsibility off of herself. Only she can fix it, once she accepts the burden of responsibility for her choices and is willing to build her life realistically around her skills and capabilities.
The fact of the matter is, a holistic approach to finances, which is what my article was about, does work; not only for me, but for everybody who observes the fundamental precepts of the philosophic concept of holistic. A holistic approach means recognizing a truck for the significant expense that it is, and ensuring that it contributes positively or at least neutrally to one's life and lifestyle.
I'm not suggesting the ideas at the following links are solutions that fit everyone; I'm suggesting that I'm not alone in recognizing that the issue has nothing to do with the dollar amount, as a holistic approach means coming up with unique and innovative solutions, and recognizing that such an approach will truly improve quality of life.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/how-do-life/201407/how-be-happier-millionaire-20k-year-really
http://moneynomad.com/6-ways-to-live-on-under-10000-a-year/
http://money.usnews.com/money/blogs/alpha-consumer/2011/10/19/the-secret-to-living-well-on-11000-a-year
http://w4.telcen.com/simpleliving.html
http://earlyretirementextreme.com/how-i-live-on-7000-per-year.html
http://kaiyan717.hubpages.com/hub/Living-on-Ten-Thousand-a-Year
http://livingstingy.blogspot.ca/2011/06/why-10000-isnt-lot-of-money-but-100-is.html
http://www.thirdstopontheright.com/2013/01/22/livingon1500/
http://www.connectedisolation.com/2011/10/how-to-live-well-on-15000-year.html
http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2007/06/29/extreme-personal-finance-living-on-12000-a-year/
http://assetbuilder.com/scott_burns/how_to_survive_on_$15000_a_year
http://money.usnews.com/money/blogs/alpha-consumer/2011/10/03/the-secret-to-living-well-on-20000-a-year
http://www.createmyindependence.com/2014/02/24/live-20000-year-without-mooching-anyone/
http://www.businessinsider.com/how-a-family-of-three-lives-on-20000-2011-12
http://martynemko.blogspot.ca/2010/02/how-i-could-live-well-on-20000-year.html
http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/12/15/see-how-one-family-lives-well-on-20-000-a-year/
http://www.cultofmoney.com/2013/10/30/how-i-raise-two-happy-healthy-kids-on-a-20000-a-year-salary/
And so on...